Exploring ISO/PPC scores by state uncovers deviations from the national average, with anomalies in states like NJ, SC, and IL, where less than 5% exceed an 8B score. This exploration raises questions about water supply accessibility and the challenges and perceived benefits of obtaining ISO scores, especially in large, sparsely populated states.
We are a small career Fire District in the north central region of Arizona about 100 miles NNE of the Phoenix metro area. With a permanent population of about 700 and covering a 55 square mile first due area. Back in 2010 our District had a PPC of 9/10. Over the subsequent 7-8 years we invested heavily in equipment, manpower and building 2 new fire stations. In 2018 we achieved a PPC of 5 for our entire Fire District. Since 2018 we have experienced a significant financial impact of increased costs of operations and loss of manpower, with an inability to hire new FF/EMTs. As a result we were forced to liquidate some of our assets and downsize our operations while remaining to provide the same services with fewer personnel and equipment. During this same timeframe insurance companies in our area reduced their ability or desire to write and or renew home owners policies due to our high FireLine Risk scores, which are independent of PPC ratings. The insurance companies would not recognize our PPC of 5 because we have NO fire hydrants in our District and our water supply portion of our PPC score was based upon HAULED WATER. We just had an ISO inspection in September and due to our downsizing equipment inventory and loss of employees we are back to a PPC of 9/10. We have also found there are several insurance underwriters that do not even consider ISO ratings when writing homeowners insurance. To me ISO does not mean very much any longer, especially in the western US where we live in the Wildland Urban Interface.